Does ChatGPT recommend
your business?
We ask ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode the questions your buyers ask, keep every answer, and show you who gets named — you, or the competitors it recommends instead.
Free · about five minutes · real answers, not estimates
What are the best vendor portal solutions for automating AP compliance?
For automating AP compliance, these vendor portals come up most often:
- 1 ·Competitor 1 — self-service onboarding with built-in TIN matching.
- 2 ·Competitor 2 — strong ERP integrations for larger AP teams.
- 3 ·Competitor 3 — simpler setup for mid-market finance teams.
- 4 ·Your business? not named · 0 of 28 answers
What a buyer sees today — from a real check, company name changed.
Every number comes from a stored AI answer or a page check we ran. Nothing is modelled from traffic estimates, and anything we can't measure is marked unmeasured — never scored as zero.
Measured across six AI surfaces
- ChatGPT
- Gemini
- Claude
- Perplexity
- AI Overviews
- AI Mode
Your buyers aren't searching anymore. They're asking — and AI is answering with someone else's name.
What you'll see
in five minutes.
The free check
Your score, your zeros, the brands named instead of you
Four measured sections roll up to one score. Every AI surface reports whether it named you — including the zeros. The brands it recommended instead are ranked; their percentages open in the audit.
where you show up
younamed instead of you
share of voice · in the audit
what's holding you back
all three fixable · the audit says how
sample — a real check, company name changed to example.com
| The ten buyer questions we asked | Intent | ChatGPT | Gemini | Claude | Perplexity | AIO | AI Mode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best vendor portal software solutions for automating AP compliance? | best | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| What is the best software for automated IRS TIN matching and vendor data validation? | best | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Top vendor onboarding platforms for accounts payable teams to prevent fraud | best | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Which are the best vendor information management tools for enterprise AP? | best | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Self-service vendor portal vs manual vendor onboarding via email: what changes? | comparison | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Compare Competitor 10 vs Competitor 1 vs standard ERP vendor portals | comparison | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| How does the IRS TIN matching program work for verifying vendor information? | informational | — | — | — | — | ✗ | ✗ |
| What is an AP contact and what vendor information is required for onboarding? | informational | — | — | — | — | ✗ | ✗ |
| What is AVIP in accounts payable and how does it protect vendor banking data? | informational | — | — | — | — | ✗ | ✗ |
| How does Example Co Vendor Portal help streamline IRS TIN matching? | brand | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ |
Ten buyer questions
The questions we asked, and who got named
Ten questions written for your category, put to all six surfaces. Every answer is kept. ✓ named · ✗ not named · — not measured.
The #1 fix
What to change first, and who does it
The highest-impact finding in full — the reason it fired, the fix, and whether a developer, an editor or marketing applies it. The rest open in the audit.
#1 · Ensure crawlers can read your page content
developerYour page serves 0 bytes of text without JavaScript; after rendering, it serves 4,748 bytes. Crawlers that don't execute JavaScript — including several AI crawlers — see an empty page, which limits how well AI can understand and cite you.
Make the page content available in the initial HTML response (server-side rendering or static HTML for the main content). This lets every crawler read the page and lifts your readiness score.
Evidence: E90 render parity check · ES2 presence score. Findings 2–6 are listed by title, impact and owner in the free check; their reasons and fixes open in the audit.
B2B vendor-portal software · sample
0 of 28 answers named them. Three fixes, all developer-side.
Presence 0, readiness 36. The page served 0 bytes without JavaScript, there was no llms.txt, and AI crawlers were unspecified in robots.txt. The audit lists the fix for each, with the evidence.
32 / 100
AI visibility score
0 / 28
Answers naming them
3
Fixes
Why it's happening,
and what to change.
A one-time audit, not a monitoring subscription. Profound starts at $99/month for one engine and 50 prompts; Ahrefs Brand Radar at $199/month. The free check already covers six surfaces and ten questions.
There's no direct purchase — run the free check first; the audit unlocks from your report.
Everything in the free check, plus
- Every finding with the reason it fired and the fix — tagged developer, editor or marketing.
- Engine-by-engine tables and your share of voice against the brands that beat you.
- The domains AI answers cite in your category — where you need to be mentioned.
- What assistants say about you, and where they get it wrong.
- Your site's AI readiness: robots.txt, llms.txt, rendered vs raw content, schema.
- The answers we collected, so you can check every claim.
- A permanent link. Nothing re-runs — the numbers you saw are the numbers you get.